The allegations against
BDM
In June 2002, BDM were accused of working with former
Enron executives of stealing more than $7.3 million from their employer,
Greenwich NatWest a division of National Westminster Bank.
The charges claim that with the help of former Enron
executives Michael Kopper and Andrew Fastow, the three men had their
employer sell back its share of an Enron-related partnership for
much less than it was worth. They then bought the partnership themselves
and resold it for a much higher price, pocketing the difference.
US prosecutors have accused the men of seven counts of "wire
fraud" -
sending faxes and emails across US federal borders in furtherance
of an alleged conspiracy to defraud NatWest. If convicted the men
face up to 35 years in a US penitentiary.
They are not accused of defrauding Enron and the alleged
fraud is not said to have played any part in Enron's later downfall.
At the behest of the three, the full details of the
case were investigated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA)
- the regulator for the British banking industry - with an internal
inquiry by NatWest’s new owners,
the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS). Despite being aware of all of the
allegations, the SFO has declined to investigate.
There have never been any charges - either criminal or civil - lodged
against the men in this country.
The road to extradition:
In November 2001, prior to the collapse of Enron
or the start of any criminal investigations into that company, BDM
contacted the FSA in order to report their investment in
this transaction. Further to completing 5 hours of taped interviews
and submitting all the documentary evidence of the deal, the three
men heard nothing until the following March, when the FSA stated
that they had concluded their initial investigations and found no
evidence of any wrongdoing.
The FSA passed all the details to the US authorities with the three
men's approval. The 3 were never interviewed or contacted by the
US authorities, until in June 2002 a criminal complaint against them
was posted on the internet. When these charges were posted on the
internet RBS commented.
"We have looked at the conduct of Greenwich NatWest
during the time of its relationship with Enron and are entirely
satisfied that it acted properly."
Despite the fact that the alleged victim has so far
failed to press charges the FBI believes that it has a case. The
basis of that case rests upon the testimony of BDM to the FSA, a
number of emails and the evidence from disgraced former Enron executive,
Michael Kopper.
The key witness against them - Michael Kopper, has entered
into a plea and co-operation agreement with the US Department of
Justice and may never go to prison - depending on the number of
people he helps imprison.
The three have always maintained their innocence,
but never disclosed their defence. At no point have they sought to
avoid justice - quite the opposite. This is why we feel we can support
them.
From the very outset when they approached
the FSA, they have continually sought an investigation here in the
UK. We cannot opine as to their innocence or guilt. We do not
have an insight into their defence. We
do believe there is a case to answer, however, that case should be
answered here. This is what we are committed to achieving
|